header-logo header-logo

Employment law brief: 10 January 2019

10 January 2019 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7823 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
nlj_7823_smith

In his first brief of 2019, Ian Smith (not pictured) revisits the gig economy & reflects on the old days

  • Uber drivers remain ‘workers’; Deliveroo riders, not ‘workers’.
  • Effect of short time working on calculating statutory holiday pay.
  • Applying the justification defence in age discrimination law.

Shortly before the Christmas break, the government announced its intention to adopt most of the recommendations of the Taylor review of modern working practices and published three sets of regulations making a start on this process, though with the important caveat that they are not to come into force until April 2020. Along with specific measures in these regulations it is proposed to seek to bring more clarity to the definitions of ‘employee’, ‘worker’ (or ‘dependent contractor’) and ‘self employed’. What river will be diverted to clean out these particular employment law Augean stables remains to be seen. In the meantime, the first two cases considered here show how advantageous any progress here would be. In the third case, the Court of Justice of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

Morrison Foerster—Jenny Galloway & Luke Rowland

Morrison Foerster—Jenny Galloway & Luke Rowland

Firm grows London practice with two partner promotions

Hogan Lovells—David Hansom

Hogan Lovells—David Hansom

Government contracts and procurement practice expands with London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll