header-logo header-logo

Employment law brief: 10 January 2019

10 January 2019 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7823 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
nlj_7823_smith

In his first brief of 2019, Ian Smith (not pictured) revisits the gig economy & reflects on the old days

  • Uber drivers remain ‘workers’; Deliveroo riders, not ‘workers’.
  • Effect of short time working on calculating statutory holiday pay.
  • Applying the justification defence in age discrimination law.

Shortly before the Christmas break, the government announced its intention to adopt most of the recommendations of the Taylor review of modern working practices and published three sets of regulations making a start on this process, though with the important caveat that they are not to come into force until April 2020. Along with specific measures in these regulations it is proposed to seek to bring more clarity to the definitions of ‘employee’, ‘worker’ (or ‘dependent contractor’) and ‘self employed’. What river will be diverted to clean out these particular employment law Augean stables remains to be seen. In the meantime, the first two cases considered here show how advantageous any progress here would be. In the third case, the Court of Justice of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll