header-logo header-logo

09 October 2015 / John McMullen
Issue: 7671 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment matters

nlj_7671_mcmullen

John McMullen discusses unfair dismissal & reasonableness

When examining an employer’s decision to dismiss, a number of well established principles come into play for the purposes of the test of fairness in s 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996).

First, in relation to alleged conduct, the test for establishing a fair reason for dismissal is laid down by British Home Stores Limited v Burchell [1978] IRLR 379, [1980] ICR 303n. The employer must genuinely believe the employee is guilty of the conduct and hold that belief on reasonable grounds following a reasonable investigation. The employment tribunal then has to consider whether the employer’s decision to dismiss on the ground of that conduct fell within the range of reasonable responses available to a reasonable employer (Iceland Frozen Foods v Jones [1982] IRLR 439, [1983] ICR 17). An employment tribunal must not substitute its own view for that of a dismissing employer. In other words it must avoid a “substitution mind set” (London Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Small [2009] IRLR 563,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll