header-logo header-logo

Employment Tribunal Fees review…finally!

19 June 2015
Issue: 7657 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has launched its long-awaited impact review of employment tribunal fees, two years after their introduction.

The review will consider the effectiveness of the fee remissions scheme, as well as look at data on case volumes, progression and outcomes. It will research the views of court and tribunal users, look for key trends and examine the extent to which there has been any discouragement of weak or unmeritorious claims. It is due to be completed by the end of this year.

The announcement comes just weeks before the Court of Appeal hearing into Unison’s judicial review application over tribunal fees, in which the union argued the fees were unlawful because they would deny access to justice for workers and had a disproportionate impact on women. The High Court ruled last year that it was too early to tell the impact.

Tribunal claims dropped by about 80% in the first six months after fees were introduced, although more recent figures show the number of multiple claims has since almost recovered and the number of claims as a whole is rising again.

Issue: 7657 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll