header-logo header-logo

29 May 2008 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7323 / Categories: Features , Discrimination , Human rights , Employment
printer mail-detail

Equal but different

Is the single equality project about to go critical? Charles Pigott investigates

The long-running project to draft a single Equality Act is about to reach its critical phase. The government's response to the consultation launched by the Discrimination Law Review's green paper, published last summer, is expected shortly. According to the Women and Equality Unit it has attracted around 4,000 responses. If dealing with these were not a daunting enough task, recent cases illustrate just how difficult it will be to establish and preserve consistency between the various discrimination strands.

The Scale of the Task

At present British discrimination law could be divided into four groups of measures:

  •   
    ●     The regulations dealing
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll