header-logo header-logo

Failing to go the distance

27 January 2012 / Kim Beatson
Issue: 7498 / Categories: Features , EU , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Kim Beatson investigates the struggle to establish jurisdiction in pre-nuptial cases

The EU provides for citizens to live and work in fellow member states which can lead to disharmony between the civil law jurisdictions of Europe which generally employ notarised marital property regimes and the common law jurisdictions which attach no property consequences to marriage and rely on judicial discretion.

Difficulties have arisen as separating couples have raced to seize jurisdiction, not choosing the jurisdiction with which the marriage has the closest connection, but deliberately concentrating on the financial outcome.

English advantage

It is not, therefore, surprising that the most prominent recent case law on pre-nuptial agreements involves foreign nationals seeking advantage from the English courts.

Most practitioners will be familiar with the case of Granatino v Radmacher [2010] UKSC 42, [2011] 1 All ER 373. The Supreme Court judgment was handed down in October 2010 when Nicholas Granatino, a French-born banker, challenged the Court of Appeal ruling which reduced his divorce settlement from his former wife, Katrin

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll