header-logo header-logo

27 January 2012 / Kim Beatson
Issue: 7498 / Categories: Features , EU , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Failing to go the distance

Kim Beatson investigates the struggle to establish jurisdiction in pre-nuptial cases

The EU provides for citizens to live and work in fellow member states which can lead to disharmony between the civil law jurisdictions of Europe which generally employ notarised marital property regimes and the common law jurisdictions which attach no property consequences to marriage and rely on judicial discretion.

Difficulties have arisen as separating couples have raced to seize jurisdiction, not choosing the jurisdiction with which the marriage has the closest connection, but deliberately concentrating on the financial outcome.

English advantage

It is not, therefore, surprising that the most prominent recent case law on pre-nuptial agreements involves foreign nationals seeking advantage from the English courts.

Most practitioners will be familiar with the case of Granatino v Radmacher [2010] UKSC 42, [2011] 1 All ER 373. The Supreme Court judgment was handed down in October 2010 when Nicholas Granatino, a French-born banker, challenged the Court of Appeal ruling which reduced his divorce settlement from his former wife, Katrin

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Commercial and technology team in Cambridge strengthened by partner hire

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Hampshire firm appoints head of new family department

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Firm strengthens securities practice with partner return

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll