header-logo header-logo

Failing to go the distance

27 January 2012 / Kim Beatson
Issue: 7498 / Categories: Features , EU , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Kim Beatson investigates the struggle to establish jurisdiction in pre-nuptial cases

The EU provides for citizens to live and work in fellow member states which can lead to disharmony between the civil law jurisdictions of Europe which generally employ notarised marital property regimes and the common law jurisdictions which attach no property consequences to marriage and rely on judicial discretion.

Difficulties have arisen as separating couples have raced to seize jurisdiction, not choosing the jurisdiction with which the marriage has the closest connection, but deliberately concentrating on the financial outcome.

English advantage

It is not, therefore, surprising that the most prominent recent case law on pre-nuptial agreements involves foreign nationals seeking advantage from the English courts.

Most practitioners will be familiar with the case of Granatino v Radmacher [2010] UKSC 42, [2011] 1 All ER 373. The Supreme Court judgment was handed down in October 2010 when Nicholas Granatino, a French-born banker, challenged the Court of Appeal ruling which reduced his divorce settlement from his former wife, Katrin

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll