header-logo header-logo

Families at war

18 November 2016 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7723 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Paola Fudakowska & Henrietta Mason report on recent wills & probate disputes

  • Adult children and their possible rights under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975.
  • Using lack of knowledge and approval as an alternative to lack of testamentary capacity in challenging the validity of a will.

There is no doubt that the press interest in the long running litigation in Ilott v Mitson has resulted in a considerable increase in enquiries by adult children as to their possible rights under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (the 1975 Act). While we await the Supreme Court’s decision (the case is due to be heard in December), the law is in a state of flux.

Nevertheless time marches on and decisions continue to be made. One such case is Ames v Jones [2016] EW Misc B67 (CC) which sees a failed application by Danielle, the adult daughter of the deceased, for provision from her father’s estate. Danielle argued that the will, which had left the entire estate to the deceased’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll