header-logo header-logo

Families at war

18 November 2016 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7723 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Paola Fudakowska & Henrietta Mason report on recent wills & probate disputes

  • Adult children and their possible rights under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975.
  • Using lack of knowledge and approval as an alternative to lack of testamentary capacity in challenging the validity of a will.

There is no doubt that the press interest in the long running litigation in Ilott v Mitson has resulted in a considerable increase in enquiries by adult children as to their possible rights under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (the 1975 Act). While we await the Supreme Court’s decision (the case is due to be heard in December), the law is in a state of flux.

Nevertheless time marches on and decisions continue to be made. One such case is Ames v Jones [2016] EW Misc B67 (CC) which sees a failed application by Danielle, the adult daughter of the deceased, for provision from her father’s estate. Danielle argued that the will, which had left the entire estate to the deceased’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll