header-logo header-logo

Families at war

18 November 2016 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7723 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Paola Fudakowska & Henrietta Mason report on recent wills & probate disputes

  • Adult children and their possible rights under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975.
  • Using lack of knowledge and approval as an alternative to lack of testamentary capacity in challenging the validity of a will.

There is no doubt that the press interest in the long running litigation in Ilott v Mitson has resulted in a considerable increase in enquiries by adult children as to their possible rights under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (the 1975 Act). While we await the Supreme Court’s decision (the case is due to be heard in December), the law is in a state of flux.

Nevertheless time marches on and decisions continue to be made. One such case is Ames v Jones [2016] EW Misc B67 (CC) which sees a failed application by Danielle, the adult daughter of the deceased, for provision from her father’s estate. Danielle argued that the will, which had left the entire estate to the deceased’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll