header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
18 November 2016 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7723 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Families at war

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Paola Fudakowska & Henrietta Mason report on recent wills & probate disputes
  • Adult children and their possible rights under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975.
  • Using lack of knowledge and approval as an alternative to lack of testamentary capacity in challenging the validity of a will.

There is no doubt that the press interest in the long running litigation in Ilott v Mitson has resulted in a considerable increase in enquiries by adult children as to their possible rights under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (the 1975 Act). While we await the Supreme Court’s decision (the case is due to be heard in December), the law is in a state of flux.

Nevertheless time marches on and decisions continue to be made. One such case is Ames v Jones [2016] EW Misc B67 (CC) which sees a failed application by Danielle, the adult daughter of the deceased, for provision from her father’s estate. Danielle argued that the will, which had left the entire estate to the deceased’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll