header-logo header-logo

Families without lawyers in care cases

05 June 2024
Issue: 8074 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Profession , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

More than a quarter of parties in some areas of England and Wales are unrepresented in public family law cases, which determine whether a child should be removed into local authority care

Figures collected by the Law Society found 30% unrepresented in Medway and Canterbury, 28% unrepresented in Portsmouth (Hampshire and Isle of Wight), 27% unrepresented in North Wales, 26.5% unrepresented in Devon, and 25% unrepresented in South East Wales.

Lizzy Parkes, national helpline manager at Support Through Court, said: ‘Many of the family cases we are seeing at our service are eligible for legal aid but cannot find a legal aid provider with the capacity to take on new cases.

‘At the same time, the majority, if not all, of the cases involve domestic abuse.’

Liz Fisher-Frank, acting director at Essex Law Clinic, said: ‘Where in the past a solicitor’s letter may have resolved issues or encouraged mediation, now clients seeking to resolve issues, where necessary, must navigate the process of making an application to the court on their own—which can be incredibly daunting and for some simply too much to deal with.’

The Law Society has called on the next government to increase civil legal aid to make the work financially viable, uprate the civil legal aid means test eligibility to widen the pool of people eligible for legal aid, and collect and publish better data on the family justice system.

Law Society president Nick Emmerson said: ‘Our members tell us that they see litigants in person (LiPs) who represent themselves feeling overwhelmed with court process, court orders and procedure rules, which leads them to have difficulties.

‘There has been a small improvement in 2024 of the number of cases with representation in private family law. However, much more is needed to make our family law justice system fit for purpose.’

Issue: 8074 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Profession , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll