header-logo header-logo

Family law brief: August 2025

08 August 2025 / Ellie Hampson-Jones
Issue: 8128 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail
227500
In the summer update, Ellie Hampson-Jones delivers a bumper Standish v Standish special
  • The Supreme Court has clarified that non-matrimonial property—including assets acquired before the marriage—should generally be excluded from the sharing principle in divorce settlements.
  • The judgment reinforced the distinction between matrimonial and non-matrimonial property, stating that the source of the wealth, not the title or transfer process, determines its classification.
  • The ruling provides a clearer framework for family law and wealth management practitioners, particularly regarding how non-matrimonial assets may become matrimonial through shared treatment over time.

On 30 April and 1 May 2025, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom heard the appeal of Mrs Standish against the decision of the Court of Appeal to reduce her divorce award by 45%, from £45m to £25m, the largest ever amount by percentage and value. On 2 July 2025, just two months after the hearing, the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed Mrs Standish’s appeal ([2025] UKSC 26).

This is the first case since White v White [2001] 1 AC

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School and the Frenkel Topping Group—AKA The insider—crowns Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP as his case of 2025 in his latest column for NLJ. The High Court’s decision—that non-authorised employees cannot conduct litigation, even under supervision—has sent shockwaves through the profession. Regan calls it the year’s defining moment for civil practitioners and reproduces a ‘cut-out-and-keep’ summary of key rulings from Mr Justice Sheldon
back-to-top-scroll