header-logo header-logo

FCA calls for action on greenwashing

02 November 2022
Issue: 8001 / Categories: Legal News , Environment , ESG , Marketing
printer mail-detail
A clampdown on the practice of greenwashing investment products has been proposed by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).

Measures being considered include product labels that certify sustainable investment, with three categories measuring sustainability over time, and restrictions on the use of terms such as ‘green’, ‘sustainable’ and ‘ESG’ in marketing literature. Detailed disclosures on investments could be made available for institutional investors and retail investors who want to know more, while consumer-facing disclosures would provide information on the key sustainability-related features of an investment product. The FCA would also introduce a general ‘anti-greenwashing’ rule for all regulated firms.

Sacha Sadan, the FCA’s director of environment social and governance (ESG), said: ‘Greenwashing misleads consumers and erodes trust in all ESG products.

‘Consumers must be confident when products claim to be sustainable that they actually are. Our proposed rules will help consumers and firms build trust in this sector. '

James Alleyne, legal director in the financial services regulatory team at Kingsley Napley, said: ‘These proposed new rules clearly demonstrate that the FCA is putting ESG issues at the heart of its consumer protection strategy.

‘They will not only assist consumers in making effective ethical investment decisions but will also provide the FCA with the necessary regulatory infrastructure to take decisive supervisory and enforcement action against firms which seek to mislead about sustainability.

‘Regulated firms will likely have until mid-2023 to get their house in order but would be advised to start implementing these standards as soon as possible if they want to follow best practice in sustainable investing and avoid other potential legal and regulatory consequences.’

The FCA consultation, ‘Sustainability disclosure requirements (SDR) and investment labels’ (CP22/20), published last week, ends on 25 January, with the new rules due to be published by the end of the first half of 2023.

Issue: 8001 / Categories: Legal News , Environment , ESG , Marketing
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Set creates new client and business development role amid growth

Kingsley Napley—Tim Lowles

Kingsley Napley—Tim Lowles

Sports disputes practice launchedwith partner appointment

mfg Solicitors—Tom Evans

mfg Solicitors—Tom Evans

Tax and succession planning offering expands with returning partner

NEWS
The rank of King’s Counsel (KC) has been awarded to 96 barristers, and no solicitors, in the latest silk round
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
back-to-top-scroll