header-logo header-logo

Fire & rehire: on the way out?

24 March 2023 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 8018 / Categories: Features , Employment , Disciplinary&grievance procedures
printer mail-detail
115851
How much change will the fire & rehire code deliver? Charles Pigott assesses the government’s draft code of practice
  • The government is consulting on a new statutory code of practice on dismissal and re-engagement.
  • If approved, it will build on existing legal protections for staff who are dismissed and offered re-engagement on new terms and conditions.

Billed as an encouragement to manage change ‘in a more balanced and collaborative way’ the draft Code of Practice on dismissal and re-engagement offers an eight-section guide for employers wishing to implement changes to terms and conditions.

The government promised to develop a new statutory code last year as part of its response to the P&O Ferries dismissal controversy, when 800 UK-based seafarers were dismissed without warning to make space for lower paid agency staff.

Scope of the code

The code would apply if an employer wishes to make changes to terms and conditions and envisages that, if the employees don’t agree, it might dismiss them and either offer them re-engagement

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll