header-logo header-logo

24 March 2023 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 8018 / Categories: Features , Employment , Disciplinary&grievance procedures
printer mail-detail

Fire & rehire: on the way out?

115851
How much change will the fire & rehire code deliver? Charles Pigott assesses the government’s draft code of practice
  • The government is consulting on a new statutory code of practice on dismissal and re-engagement.
  • If approved, it will build on existing legal protections for staff who are dismissed and offered re-engagement on new terms and conditions.

Billed as an encouragement to manage change ‘in a more balanced and collaborative way’ the draft Code of Practice on dismissal and re-engagement offers an eight-section guide for employers wishing to implement changes to terms and conditions.

The government promised to develop a new statutory code last year as part of its response to the P&O Ferries dismissal controversy, when 800 UK-based seafarers were dismissed without warning to make space for lower paid agency staff.

Scope of the code

The code would apply if an employer wishes to make changes to terms and conditions and envisages that, if the employees don’t agree, it might dismiss them and either offer them

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Bellevue Law—Sally Hall

Bellevue Law—Sally Hall

Employment boutique strengthens data protection and privacy offering with senior consultant hire

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll