header-logo header-logo

24 March 2023 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 8018 / Categories: Features , Employment , Disciplinary&grievance procedures
printer mail-detail

Fire & rehire: on the way out?

115851
How much change will the fire & rehire code deliver? Charles Pigott assesses the government’s draft code of practice
  • The government is consulting on a new statutory code of practice on dismissal and re-engagement.
  • If approved, it will build on existing legal protections for staff who are dismissed and offered re-engagement on new terms and conditions.

Billed as an encouragement to manage change ‘in a more balanced and collaborative way’ the draft Code of Practice on dismissal and re-engagement offers an eight-section guide for employers wishing to implement changes to terms and conditions.

The government promised to develop a new statutory code last year as part of its response to the P&O Ferries dismissal controversy, when 800 UK-based seafarers were dismissed without warning to make space for lower paid agency staff.

Scope of the code

The code would apply if an employer wishes to make changes to terms and conditions and envisages that, if the employees don’t agree, it might dismiss them and either offer them

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll