header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
24 March 2023 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 8018 / Categories: Features , Employment , Disciplinary&grievance procedures
printer mail-detail

Fire & rehire: on the way out?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
115851
How much change will the fire & rehire code deliver? Charles Pigott assesses the government’s draft code of practice
  • The government is consulting on a new statutory code of practice on dismissal and re-engagement.
  • If approved, it will build on existing legal protections for staff who are dismissed and offered re-engagement on new terms and conditions.

Billed as an encouragement to manage change ‘in a more balanced and collaborative way’ the draft Code of Practice on dismissal and re-engagement offers an eight-section guide for employers wishing to implement changes to terms and conditions.

The government promised to develop a new statutory code last year as part of its response to the P&O Ferries dismissal controversy, when 800 UK-based seafarers were dismissed without warning to make space for lower paid agency staff.

Scope of the code

The code would apply if an employer wishes to make changes to terms and conditions and envisages that, if the employees don’t agree, it might dismiss them and either offer them

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll