header-logo header-logo

03 June 2010 / Lisa Hatch
Issue: 7420 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Terms&conditions , Employment
printer mail-detail

Fit for purpose?

Lisa Hatch weighs up the evidential value of the new style sick notes for disability discrimination claims

Most employers and employment lawyers will at some point have come across GP’s sick notes produced by absent employees. However, on 6 April 2010 the old style Med 3 and Med 5 sick notes familiar to many were replaced with a new-style “fit note”. Officially titled a “Statement of Fitness for Work” the new note is now being issued by GPs to patients off sick from work. The new single form will be used for both statutory sick pay and social security claims (see the Social Security (Medical Evidence) and Statutory Sick Pay (Medical Evidence) (Amendment) Regulations 2010 (SI 2010/137) and is only issued if the patient is off sick for more than seven days. GPs are required to tick a box on the form to confirm whether the patient is “not fit for work” or “may be fit for work taking account of the following advice”. In a crucial change from the old sick notes,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Flint Bishop—Charlotte Harris

Flint Bishop—Charlotte Harris

Sheffield expansion continues with appointment of commercial property partner

Browne Jacobson—Paul Duggan

Browne Jacobson—Paul Duggan

Browne Jacobson strengthens banking and finance practice with latest partner appointment Paul Duggan

Ward Hadaway—Chris Piggott

Ward Hadaway—Chris Piggott

Employment partner joins Ward Hadaway

NEWS
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

back-to-top-scroll