header-logo header-logo

Force majeure: steering through uncertainty

06 December 2024 / Gustavo Moser
Issue: 8097 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Contract
printer mail-detail
200296
Gustavo Moser sheds light on the nuances of negotiating & enforcing force majeure clauses
  • Tailored protection: customise force majeure clauses for optimal coverage in unforeseen circumstances, safeguarding against potential losses.
  • Clear accountability: define triggers and obligations to enhance contract management, eliminate ambiguity and ensure accountability.
  • Strategic legal choice: select a suitable legal framework for effective enforcement, protecting parties’ intentions and enabling efficient dispute resolution

In the midst of worldwide uncertainties such as the pandemic, armed conflicts, financial upheavals, natural calamities and trade restrictions, force majeure (FM) clauses have sparked the interest of the legal community. These unforeseen events, whether detailed in contracts or enshrined in statutory laws, are now critical considerations for practitioners and decision-makers alike.

Against the backdrop of the volatile economic and geopolitical scene, crafting an FM clause with precision is key to building a robust contractual base. This strategic approach is particularly indispensable for entities venturing through turbulent industry sectors and territories that are known to be susceptible to sudden disruptions and uncertainties (geopolitical instability, economic

To access this full article please fill the form below.
All fields are mandatory unless marked as 'Optional'.
If you already a subscriber to New Law Journal, please login here

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll