header-logo header-logo

Freelance plans approved

08 November 2018
Issue: 7816 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Solicitors can now practise from unregulated firms, despite protests

The Legal Services Board (LSB) has given the green light to controversial plans to allow freelance solicitors and let regulated solicitors practise from unregulated firms—despite protestations by the Law Society that they put consumers at risk.

The Looking to the Future reforms, proposed by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), were approved in full this week. Solicitors can now provide unreserved services while working from an unregulated organisation. Self-employed solicitors can provide reserved services without being authorised as an entity. 

LSB chair, Dr Helen Phillips, acknowledged that there were ‘some potential risks’ but added that ‘when set against the potential benefits… these risks do not create compelling grounds for refusing the proposal.

‘In addition to likely benefits to access to justice, promoting competition and the public interest, we considered that there was some merit in the SRA's argument that these changes could be seen to increase consumer protection, given that many consumers already use unregulated providers and in doing so receive no regulatory protections.’

However, Law Society president Christina Blacklaws said the rule change was a ‘serious error’ that ‘sacrificed the best interests of the public’.

‘They have ignored unprecedented levels of opposition from consumer bodies, legal experts and the extensive evidence of the risks of deregulation of this kind in this market,’ she said.

‘The door is now open for practitioners to cut their costs by slashing essential client protections that until today have provided cast-iron reassurance for clients. A high street where different tiers of solicitor, with different levels of protections offer the same services to passers-by will make it more difficult for people who need legal advice to reach informed choices often at very traumatic moments in their lives, such as divorce and bereavement.’

The LSB received more than 130 unsolicited letters and emails about the reforms, the vast majority of which opposed the plans.

Issue: 7816 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll