header-logo header-logo

11 September 2008
Issue: 7336 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

Funding shortfall threatens court system

Courts

An alleged £90m financial black hole in the courts service budget highlights fundamental problems in the government’s approach to court funding, causing problems for all those concerned, say lawyers.

In a letter leaked to the Conservative Party, Lord Justice Leveson warns that £27m of cost saving exercises must be made by March 2009 to off set the effects of a sharp fall in court income—a total saving of £90m must be made over the next three years and that redundancies may become a reality.

The letter says the fall in court income has resulted from a reduction in the number of cases brought by HM Revenue & Customs to retrieve unpaid taxes in the magistrates’ courts. It is also claims that reductions in debt collection has led to a funding shortfall.

David Greene, president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, says the shortfall shows that the government is willing to abandon responsibility for maintaining the court system. “For many years, the court system has been run on the principle that it should be selffunding,” he says.

“This means that the burden of running our courts falls on the less well-off who become embroiled in the civil court process either through debt proceedings or housing possessions and then have to pay the costs orders against them.”

Issue: 7336 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll