header-logo header-logo

04 May 2012 / Eugene Wojciechowski , Clare Arthurs
Issue: 7512 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Game plan

london-olympic-games-2012-logo_0_4

Eugene Wojciechowski & Clare Arthurs predict how an Olympian summer could affect the workplace

The Olympic torch relay begins at Lands End on 19 May, marking the beginning of the largest sporting event ever held in the UK, the London 2012 Olympics. The Olympics begin on 27 July when the torch reaches the Olympic Stadium, and end on 12 August 2012. They are followed from 29 August to 9 September 2012 by the second largest sporting event ever held in the UK, the London 2012 Paralympics (together, the Games). How will this Olympian summer impact on businesses, and what can employers do to minimise that impact?

Flexible transport

Transport during the Games is a key concern for employers, particularly in London. If the Games could cause transport problems where your business is located, the advice is to reduce your employees’ need to travel. This may be done by staggering the start and finish times of working days, temporarily relocating employees, altering their working hours, or providing the facilities for staff to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll