header-logo header-logo

05 June 2008 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7324 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Terms&conditions , Employment
printer mail-detail

Giving sick workers a break

Employers may need to ensure that workers who are off sick do not miss out on their holiday entitlement, says Charles Pigott

Advocate general Verica Trstenjak delivered her opinions in two references about the interpretation of the Working Time Directive 2003/88 (WTD) on 24 January 2008. The British reference (now known as Stringer and others v Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs C-520/06) is essentially about two questions: whether a worker can re-designate a period of sick leave as holiday leave, and how payment in lieu of untaken holiday leave should be calculated for workers who have been off sick for all or part of the holiday year. The German reference (Schultz-Hoff v Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund C-350/06) was made before Stringer but takes the questions it poses to their logical conclusion by tackling the question of whether a sick worker should be allowed to carry forward unused holiday leave.

At the heart of the two references are the brief provisions of Art 7 of the WTD dealing with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll