header-logo header-logo

05 June 2008 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7324 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Terms&conditions , Employment
printer mail-detail

Giving sick workers a break

Employers may need to ensure that workers who are off sick do not miss out on their holiday entitlement, says Charles Pigott

Advocate general Verica Trstenjak delivered her opinions in two references about the interpretation of the Working Time Directive 2003/88 (WTD) on 24 January 2008. The British reference (now known as Stringer and others v Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs C-520/06) is essentially about two questions: whether a worker can re-designate a period of sick leave as holiday leave, and how payment in lieu of untaken holiday leave should be calculated for workers who have been off sick for all or part of the holiday year. The German reference (Schultz-Hoff v Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund C-350/06) was made before Stringer but takes the questions it poses to their logical conclusion by tackling the question of whether a sick worker should be allowed to carry forward unused holiday leave.

At the heart of the two references are the brief provisions of Art 7 of the WTD dealing with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll