header-logo header-logo

26 October 2017
Issue: 7767 / Categories: Legal News , Tribunals , Employment
printer mail-detail

Government pays up after tribunal fee fiasco

The government is to pay back all employment tribunal fees—ruled unlawful by the Supreme Court in July—along with 0.5% interest.

The government is to pay back all employment tribunal fees—ruled unlawful by the Supreme Court in July—along with 0.5% interest.

In the fi rst stage, it will contact about 1,000 people who have applied for refunds concerning single claims. Next month, the repayment scheme will be opened up for everyone else.

Trade union Unison won a historic victory in R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, where seven Justices unanimously held that the government unlawfully introduced fees ranging from £160 to £230 or £950 for further hearings, and as much as £1,200 for certain claims, in July 2013.

Unison head of legal services Adam Creme said: ‘The real tragedy of the fees fiasco is the thousands of wronged employees who couldn’t aff ord to shell out to get justice and so lost out.’

Issue: 7767 / Categories: Legal News , Tribunals , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll