header-logo header-logo

An A-Grade Service

The Law Society and its members have been punished unfairly, says Des Hudson

The decision by Zahida Manzoor, the Legal Services Complaints Commissioner, to fine the Law Society £275,000 for the perceived inadequacies of its complaints handling plan for 2008–09, was a decision we strongly disagreed with.

That might seem an obvious statement, but if the Legal Complaints Services (LCS) performance was poor, we would be in a position to put our hands up and accept the punishment and move forward. That is certainly not the case in this instance, however.

The Law Society and its members have been punished in spite of improving standards for consumers on complaints handling to a level which matches or exceeds that of other complaints handling bodies.

To make a comparison with school, an improving pupil whose marks are rising would not be punished with a detention or sent to the head's office for a telling off. The commissioner, however, has handed out this fine despite the LCS's improving record in the sphere of consumer redress.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll