header-logo header-logo

An A-Grade Service

The Law Society and its members have been punished unfairly, says Des Hudson

The decision by Zahida Manzoor, the Legal Services Complaints Commissioner, to fine the Law Society £275,000 for the perceived inadequacies of its complaints handling plan for 2008–09, was a decision we strongly disagreed with.

That might seem an obvious statement, but if the Legal Complaints Services (LCS) performance was poor, we would be in a position to put our hands up and accept the punishment and move forward. That is certainly not the case in this instance, however.

The Law Society and its members have been punished in spite of improving standards for consumers on complaints handling to a level which matches or exceeds that of other complaints handling bodies.

To make a comparison with school, an improving pupil whose marks are rising would not be punished with a detention or sent to the head's office for a telling off. The commissioner, however, has handed out this fine despite the LCS's improving record in the sphere of consumer redress.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll