header-logo header-logo

​Great expectations

09 December 2016 / Giselle Davies , Bethan Walsh , Giselle Davies
Issue: 7726 / Categories: Features , Charities
printer mail-detail
nlj_7726_davies

Giselle Davies & Bethan Walsh outline what to expect from the Law Commission’s recent consultation on charity law

  • An analysis of the Law Commission Supplementary Consultation on Technical Issues in Charity Law.

The Law Commission recently entered into supplementary consultation on two further technical points where reforms are proposed after these were raised by respondents during its Consultation on Technical Issues in Charity Law last year.

The first proposal would allow unincorporated charities to change their purposes in the same way as corporate charities do. The second proposal would make it easier for incorporated charities to achieve “trust corporation” status.

Unincorporated & incorporated charities

“Charity” is a status rather than a legal structure. Legal structures fall into one of two categories; unincorporated (such as Trusts and Associations) and incorporated (such as companies, charitable incorporated organisations (CIOs) and community benefit societies).

An unincorporated charity has no legal personality separate from its trustees so the trustees must enter into contracts personally on behalf of the charity and this raises issues of personal liability

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll