header-logo header-logo

A growing issue

11 March 2016 / Stephen Hurley
Issue: 7690 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
001_nlj_7690_hurley

Fat shaming & disability harassment. Stephen Hurley reports

If an employer allows “fat shaming” in the workplace, they may now be at risk of a claim of unlawful disability harassment.

In Bickerstaff v Butcher NIIT/92/14 (unreported) Neil Bickerstaff worked for Randox Laboratories Ltd in Northern Ireland. He had a body mass index (BMI) of 48.5 (a person with a BMI of 30 or over is classed by the World Health Organisation as being obese). On numerous occasions he suffered abusive comments by a number of work colleagues including being called a “fat bastard”.

Bickerstaff ultimately resigned. The Tribunal sitting in Belfast found that he had been a victim of unlawful harassment under the Disability Discrimination 1995 (the law in England & Wales now being contained in the Equality Act 2010).

In an important decision, albeit at first instance, the Tribunal concluded that he was disabled. A person has a disability if he has “a physical or mental impairment which has a substantial and long term adverse effect on his ability to carry out normal day to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll