header-logo header-logo

A growing issue

11 March 2016 / Stephen Hurley
Issue: 7690 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
001_nlj_7690_hurley

Fat shaming & disability harassment. Stephen Hurley reports

If an employer allows “fat shaming” in the workplace, they may now be at risk of a claim of unlawful disability harassment.

In Bickerstaff v Butcher NIIT/92/14 (unreported) Neil Bickerstaff worked for Randox Laboratories Ltd in Northern Ireland. He had a body mass index (BMI) of 48.5 (a person with a BMI of 30 or over is classed by the World Health Organisation as being obese). On numerous occasions he suffered abusive comments by a number of work colleagues including being called a “fat bastard”.

Bickerstaff ultimately resigned. The Tribunal sitting in Belfast found that he had been a victim of unlawful harassment under the Disability Discrimination 1995 (the law in England & Wales now being contained in the Equality Act 2010).

In an important decision, albeit at first instance, the Tribunal concluded that he was disabled. A person has a disability if he has “a physical or mental impairment which has a substantial and long term adverse effect on his ability to carry out normal day to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll