header-logo header-logo

18 March 2016 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7691 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Hands off

Nicholas Dobson examines the use of prerogative powers & review

The Queen of Hearts in Lewis Carroll’s Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland was afforded a broad margin of appreciation in her use of prerogative powers. Untroubled by any contemporary notion of rights (human or animal), her principal instrument of governance was capital punishment. She utilised this with great and casual frequency to resolve any juristic matter. As Carroll indicates: “The Queen had only one way of settling all difficulties, great or small. ‘Off with his head!’ she said, without even looking round.” Worth noting also was another of her jurisprudential principles: “Sentence first—verdict afterwards.”

However, the UK as a mature democracy with a constitutional monarchy has rather more measured arrangements. And while prerogative powers remain (famously defined by British jurist and constitutional theorist, AV Dicey as “the residue of discretionary or arbitrary authority, which at any given time is legally left in the hands of the Crown”) most such powers are now exercised solely through and on the advice of ministers responsible to Parliament. Prerogative powers include those

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft strengthens Scottish real estate capabilitywith partner appointment

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints Brendan Ryan as partner in Public Law Projects team

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers welcomes five new barristers

NEWS
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
Police powers targeting concealed identities at protests come with procedural conditions that could determine whether prosecutions succeed
back-to-top-scroll