header-logo header-logo

31 July 2025
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Heir hunter calls for tough action on criminals cheating the dead

A leading probate researcher has urged the government to explore ‘safer’ ways to unite long-lost heirs with the estates they are due, following the discovery fraudsters have targeted the Bona Vacantia list

The government pulled the list, which contains detailed accounts of the estates of those who die intestate, from the public domain in July after a BBC investigation uncovered a series of frauds. Organised criminals appear to have used the list to steal the estates by posing as ‘friends’ of the deceased and presenting fake wills.

Simonne Llewellyn, chief executive of UK probate research firm Finders International, said the decision ‘marks an important moment for the probate sector.

‘As professional probate researchers, we support the removal of the list as a responsible and necessary step to reduce opportunistic fraud and safeguard estates and the interests of genuine heirs. However, this also presents an opportunity to explore safer, more robust alternatives to ensure estates are securely passed to those entitled—without putting sensitive information at risk.’

Llewellyn, whose firm locates and identifies heirs and unknown next of kin worldwide, said the probate system ‘works best when there’s a balance between transparency and control, and when all parties are committed to protecting estates. 

‘Professional probate genealogists play a key role here. With decades of experience tracing next of kin and verifying entitlement, we work alongside solicitors and public bodies to ensure estates are passed on with care and oversight. Such research can help identify truly bona vacantia estates, and prevent them being wrongly claimed or left unclaimed altogether.

‘Fraudulent wills pose a real threat. But so does the risk of genuine beneficiaries being shut out. With the right safeguards, we can achieve both fairness and security.’

The probate system, which was digitised in 2017, lacks the sophistication to pick up suspicious patterns of behaviour and lets the claims go through, according to former Justice Committee chair and MP Sir Bob Neill, who spoke to the BBC for its report.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll