header-logo header-logo

02 October 2015 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7670 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

A historical parallel

web_backpage_1

Ashhurst, Bentham & British justice, Geoffrey Bindman QC reports

The celebration of the 800th anniversary of Magna Carta has produced an outpouring of euphoria and self-congratulation on the virtues of our legal system. And it is true that its principles have been hugely influential in establishing the rule of law throughout the world. Yet there is scepticism on two fronts. The fear of terrorism leads governments and sometimes judges to overstep its fundamental safeguards of personal liberty. Second, its promise of equal justice is increasingly undermined by restrictions on access to the courts to a privileged minority. There is an interesting historical parallel.

Mr Justice Ashhurst was appointed to the Court of King’s Bench in 1770 in succession to the renowned Sir William Blackstone. Little known to the public for more than 20 years, he became famous overnight after delivering a charge to the Middlesex Grand Jury on 19 September 1792. This was his instruction to the jurors to indict a number of individuals for sedition. They were accused of publishing pamphlets urging reform in Britain

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll