header-logo header-logo

A historical parallel

02 October 2015 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7670 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
web_backpage_1

Ashhurst, Bentham & British justice, Geoffrey Bindman QC reports

The celebration of the 800th anniversary of Magna Carta has produced an outpouring of euphoria and self-congratulation on the virtues of our legal system. And it is true that its principles have been hugely influential in establishing the rule of law throughout the world. Yet there is scepticism on two fronts. The fear of terrorism leads governments and sometimes judges to overstep its fundamental safeguards of personal liberty. Second, its promise of equal justice is increasingly undermined by restrictions on access to the courts to a privileged minority. There is an interesting historical parallel.

Mr Justice Ashhurst was appointed to the Court of King’s Bench in 1770 in succession to the renowned Sir William Blackstone. Little known to the public for more than 20 years, he became famous overnight after delivering a charge to the Middlesex Grand Jury on 19 September 1792. This was his instruction to the jurors to indict a number of individuals for sedition. They were accused of publishing pamphlets urging reform in Britain

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll