header-logo header-logo

02 October 2015 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7670 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

A historical parallel

web_backpage_1

Ashhurst, Bentham & British justice, Geoffrey Bindman QC reports

The celebration of the 800th anniversary of Magna Carta has produced an outpouring of euphoria and self-congratulation on the virtues of our legal system. And it is true that its principles have been hugely influential in establishing the rule of law throughout the world. Yet there is scepticism on two fronts. The fear of terrorism leads governments and sometimes judges to overstep its fundamental safeguards of personal liberty. Second, its promise of equal justice is increasingly undermined by restrictions on access to the courts to a privileged minority. There is an interesting historical parallel.

Mr Justice Ashhurst was appointed to the Court of King’s Bench in 1770 in succession to the renowned Sir William Blackstone. Little known to the public for more than 20 years, he became famous overnight after delivering a charge to the Middlesex Grand Jury on 19 September 1792. This was his instruction to the jurors to indict a number of individuals for sedition. They were accused of publishing pamphlets urging reform in Britain

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll