header-logo header-logo

Home Office liable for EU documentation delays

19 June 2015
Issue: 7657 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Home Office may have to pay compensation in future to anyone adversely affected by delays in issuing EU documentation confirming their right to reside in the UK, following a landmark test case.

In R (on the application of Hana Zewdu) v Secretary of State for the Home Office (Crown Office ref: C/6067/2013), Mr Justice Green last week found the Home Office unlawfully delayed reaching a decision on the claimant’s right of residence. The secretary of state conceded she was therefore liable to pay damages for loss of earnings as well as damages on an aggravated basis.

Non-European Economic Area (EEA) family members of EEA workers, the self-employed, students and the self-sufficient are entitled to a right of residence in the UK, under the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations. Once the Home Office receives an application, it is obliged to immediately provide a Certificate of Application, which gives the bearer the right to work in the UK. The Home Office is then required to make a decision on the application within six months.

The European Commission has previously raised concerns about the Home Office’s failure to comply with these time limits. However, the Home Office has previously relied on the case, AB v Home Office [2012] EWHC 226 (QB), to show that it has no obligation to pay compensation.

Trevor Hatton, senior solicitor at Duncan Lewis, who acted for the claimant, says Zewdu means the Home Office will no longer be able to rely on AB: “This case confirms once and for all that the secretary of state will be liable to pay damages to any applicant who has suffered loss as a direct result of a Home Office failure to provide EU documentation in a timely manner.”

Issue: 7657 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll