header-logo header-logo

Home Office liable for EU documentation delays

19 June 2015
Issue: 7657 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Home Office may have to pay compensation in future to anyone adversely affected by delays in issuing EU documentation confirming their right to reside in the UK, following a landmark test case.

In R (on the application of Hana Zewdu) v Secretary of State for the Home Office (Crown Office ref: C/6067/2013), Mr Justice Green last week found the Home Office unlawfully delayed reaching a decision on the claimant’s right of residence. The secretary of state conceded she was therefore liable to pay damages for loss of earnings as well as damages on an aggravated basis.

Non-European Economic Area (EEA) family members of EEA workers, the self-employed, students and the self-sufficient are entitled to a right of residence in the UK, under the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations. Once the Home Office receives an application, it is obliged to immediately provide a Certificate of Application, which gives the bearer the right to work in the UK. The Home Office is then required to make a decision on the application within six months.

The European Commission has previously raised concerns about the Home Office’s failure to comply with these time limits. However, the Home Office has previously relied on the case, AB v Home Office [2012] EWHC 226 (QB), to show that it has no obligation to pay compensation.

Trevor Hatton, senior solicitor at Duncan Lewis, who acted for the claimant, says Zewdu means the Home Office will no longer be able to rely on AB: “This case confirms once and for all that the secretary of state will be liable to pay damages to any applicant who has suffered loss as a direct result of a Home Office failure to provide EU documentation in a timely manner.”

Issue: 7657 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll