header-logo header-logo

Housing spared fixed recoverable costs until 2025

08 February 2023
Issue: 8012 / Categories: Legal News , Housing , Costs , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
The Ministry of Justice has confirmed a two-year delay to the introduction of fixed recoverable costs (FRC) in housing cases.

A spokesperson said this week the Ministry wanted to align its reforms with wider reforms in the housing sector. The government is bringing forward a Social Housing Regulation Bill, which would increase the powers of the Housing Ombudsman.

The extension of FRCs to other civil cases worth up to £100,000 will continue as planned despite previous delays—the timetable has already been shuffled from October 2022 to April 2023 and then to October 2023.

Law Society president Lubna Shuja welcomed the reprieve for housing, but urged the government ‘to consider scrapping the implementation of FRCs in housing cases entirely. The complexity and unique nature of housing cases makes them unsuitable for the application of FRCs’.

Issue: 8012 / Categories: Legal News , Housing , Costs , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll