header-logo header-logo

16 December 2010 / Jonathan Arr
Issue: 7446 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Damages , Costs
printer mail-detail

How much will I get?

Jonathan Arr explores the complex world of set-off, currency conversion & exchange rates

“How much will I get if I win?” A question clients always ask. And a question—second only to “Do you think I’m going to win?”—lawyers always dread. The answer is always difficult because there are so many variables and the law is so complex: so the completeness of the evidence, the extent of mitigation, and even the judge’s gut instinct on the day, can all make a substantial difference to the outcome. The position is even more complicated when dealing in currencies other than sterling (as the English Court is increasingly willing to do): and when all of these issues are being dealt with in the context of equitable set-off, the problems are difficult enough to make even the most experienced lawyer weep with frustration.

Just such a confluence of the issues of damages and equitable set-off occurred in Fearns t/a Autopaint International v Anglo-Dutch Paint & Chemical

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll