header-logo header-logo

How much will I get?

16 December 2010 / Jonathan Arr
Issue: 7446 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Damages , Costs
printer mail-detail

Jonathan Arr explores the complex world of set-off, currency conversion & exchange rates

“How much will I get if I win?” A question clients always ask. And a question—second only to “Do you think I’m going to win?”—lawyers always dread. The answer is always difficult because there are so many variables and the law is so complex: so the completeness of the evidence, the extent of mitigation, and even the judge’s gut instinct on the day, can all make a substantial difference to the outcome. The position is even more complicated when dealing in currencies other than sterling (as the English Court is increasingly willing to do): and when all of these issues are being dealt with in the context of equitable set-off, the problems are difficult enough to make even the most experienced lawyer weep with frustration.

Just such a confluence of the issues of damages and equitable set-off occurred in Fearns t/a Autopaint International v Anglo-Dutch Paint & Chemical

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Phoebe Gogarty

Muckle LLP—Phoebe Gogarty

North East firm welcomes employment specialist

Browne Jacobson—Colette Withey

Browne Jacobson—Colette Withey

Partner joins commercial and technology practice

Ellisons—Lizzy Firmin

Ellisons—Lizzy Firmin

Chief operating officer joins equity partnership

NEWS
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold dives into the quirks of civil practice, from the Court of Appeal’s fierce defence of form N510 to fresh reminders about compliance and interest claims, in this week's Civil Way
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) has restated a fundamental truth, writes John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke, in this week's NLJ: only authorised persons can conduct litigation. The decision sparked alarm, but Gould stresses it merely confirms the Legal Services Act 2007
The government’s decision to make the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) the Single Professional Services Supervisor marks a watershed in the UK’s fight against money laundering, says Rebecca Hughes of Corker Binning in this week's NLJ. The FCA will now oversee 60,000 firms across legal and accountancy sectors—a massive expansion of remit that raises questions over resources and readiness 
The High Court's decision in Parfitt v Jones [2025] EWHC 1552 (Ch) provided a striking reminder of the need to instruct the right expert in retrospective capacity assessments, says Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell in NLJ this week
Paige Coulter of Quinn Emanuel reports on the UK’s first statutory definition of SLAPPs under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll