header-logo header-logo

16 December 2010 / Jonathan Arr
Issue: 7446 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Damages , Costs
printer mail-detail

How much will I get?

Jonathan Arr explores the complex world of set-off, currency conversion & exchange rates

“How much will I get if I win?” A question clients always ask. And a question—second only to “Do you think I’m going to win?”—lawyers always dread. The answer is always difficult because there are so many variables and the law is so complex: so the completeness of the evidence, the extent of mitigation, and even the judge’s gut instinct on the day, can all make a substantial difference to the outcome. The position is even more complicated when dealing in currencies other than sterling (as the English Court is increasingly willing to do): and when all of these issues are being dealt with in the context of equitable set-off, the problems are difficult enough to make even the most experienced lawyer weep with frustration.

Just such a confluence of the issues of damages and equitable set-off occurred in Fearns t/a Autopaint International v Anglo-Dutch Paint & Chemical

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll