header-logo header-logo

24 July 2015 / Ben Collins , Nicola Newbegin
Issue: 7662 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Employment
printer mail-detail

HRA 1998: The end

nlj_7662_collins

What would the abolition of the Human Rights Act mean for employment lawyers? Ben Collins & Nicola Newbegin share their thoughts

The government has backed off from early legislation to abolish the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) by omitting proposals for reform from the Queen’s Speech, instead merely stating that the government would “bring forward proposals for a British Bill of Rights”. However, there is no suggestion that the government has abandoned its plan entirely. What might the consequences of abandoning HRA 1998 be for the employment law community?

There is one school of thought which suggests that human rights add little to the protections offered by domestic and EU legislation on, eg, dismissal, discrimination and whistle blowing. Mummery LJ observed in Leach v Ofcom [2012] EWCA Civ 959, [2012] IRLR 839 that: “‘Human rights’ points rarely add anything much to the numerous detailed and valuable employment rights conferred on workers,” and Elias LJ cautioned in Turner v East Midlands Trains [2012] EWCA Civ 1470, [2013] 3 All ER

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Seddons GSC—Ben Marks

Seddons GSC—Ben Marks

Partner joins residential real estate team

Winckworth Sherwood—Shazia Bashir

Winckworth Sherwood—Shazia Bashir

Social housing team announces partner appointment

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

Manchester’s online LLM has accelerated career progression for its graduates

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll