header-logo header-logo

HRA 1998: The end

24 July 2015 / Ben Collins , Nicola Newbegin
Issue: 7662 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Employment
printer mail-detail
nlj_7662_collins

What would the abolition of the Human Rights Act mean for employment lawyers? Ben Collins & Nicola Newbegin share their thoughts

The government has backed off from early legislation to abolish the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) by omitting proposals for reform from the Queen’s Speech, instead merely stating that the government would “bring forward proposals for a British Bill of Rights”. However, there is no suggestion that the government has abandoned its plan entirely. What might the consequences of abandoning HRA 1998 be for the employment law community?

There is one school of thought which suggests that human rights add little to the protections offered by domestic and EU legislation on, eg, dismissal, discrimination and whistle blowing. Mummery LJ observed in Leach v Ofcom [2012] EWCA Civ 959, [2012] IRLR 839 that: “‘Human rights’ points rarely add anything much to the numerous detailed and valuable employment rights conferred on workers,” and Elias LJ cautioned in Turner v East Midlands Trains [2012] EWCA Civ 1470, [2013] 3 All ER

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll