header-logo header-logo

11 October 2024
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Hunton Andrews Kurth—Alan Cunningham & Richard Skipper

Finance partners join firm in London

Alan Cunningham and Richard Skipper, finance lawyers who advise on a broad range of financings and transactions involving aviation, shipping, rail, defence, automotive, energy and other asset classes, have joined Hunton Andrews Kurth as partners in London.

Alan and Richard represent clients throughout Europe, the United States, the Middle East and Asia, including financial institutions, private credit, private equity, leasing companies, captive and vendor finance entities, airlines, business jet operators, ship and rail owners, corporates and high-net-worth individuals.

John Schneider, co-head of Hunton Andrews Kurth’s business finance practice group, said: ‘Alan and Richard are highly regarded finance lawyers who are well known and respected throughout the London legal market. Their addition underscores both our strategic focus on financial services and commitment to outstanding client service. We are pleased to welcome them as partners to the firm.’

Alan and Richard join the firm from Ernst & Young’s legal services arm, EY Law. Previously, they were partners at DLA Piper, where they led the firm’s asset finance team.

Alan’s practice includes high-end transactional mandates and financings involving aviation, shipping, equipment finance, automotive, defence and receivables—including the sale and purchase of asset finance and other lease and loan books, forward flow receivables transactions and related securitization work. He also advises on broader aviation matters.

Richard focuses his practice on aviation finance and leasing, equipment finance, renewable energy assets, shipping and rail. He represents airlines, banks, funds, lessors, operators, manufacturers and other financial institutions.

Ferdinand Calice, managing partner of Hunton Andrews Kurth’s London office, said: ‘Alan and Richard are outstanding lawyers who very nicely complement the experience and depth of our London team. Their arrival aligns with our growth strategy, which we continue successfully to execute so as to secure our position as leaders in the London legal market.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Newcastle & North of England Law Society—Lesley Fairclough

Newcastle & North of England Law Society—Lesley Fairclough

Ward Hadaway partner becomes bicentennial president following regional merger

Devonshires—four promotions

Devonshires—four promotions

Firm promotes four senior associates to partner in annual round

Fieldfisher—John McElroy & Daniel Hayward

Fieldfisher—John McElroy & Daniel Hayward

Co-heads of dispute resolution practice appointed alongside partner promotions

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll