header-logo header-logo

I can see clearly now...

21 February 2014 / Theo Huckle KC , Cathrine Grubb
Issue: 7595 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
web_grubb_huckle

Theo Huckle QC & Cathrine Grubb examine pre-action disclosure & the application of CPR 31.16

In December, the Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in the case of Smith v Secretary of State for the Environment and Climate Change [2013] EWCA Civ 1585, which provides clear and useful guidance on CPR r 31.16.

An applicant for pre-action disclosure has to satisfy the court that:

  1. The applicant and respondent are likely to be a party to subsequent proceedings (CPR r 31.16 (3)(a) and (b)).
  2. If proceedings were started the respondent’s duty by way of standard disclosure would extend to the (class of) documents that the applicant seeks (CPR r 31.16 (3)(c)).
  3. Disclosure before proceedings is desirable in order to dispose fairly of the anticipated proceedings, assist the dispute to be resolved without proceedings and save costs (CPR r 31.16(3)(d)).

Two stage approach

CPR 31.16 requires a two-stage approach: The first stage is to establish whether these jurisdictional thresholds prescribed by heads (a)-(d) are satisfied. If so, the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll