header-logo header-logo

An ill wind?

Charles Pigott takes time out to revisit statutory holiday entitlement

The advocate general’s opinion in the German reference KHS AG v Schulte C-214/10 addresses what should happen to a worker’s holiday entitlement under the Working Time Directive 2003/88/EC (WTD) when a period of continuous sick leave straddles more than one leave year. This question had previously been considered by the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) in Schultz-Hoff v Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund [2009] All ER (EC) 906, [2009] IRLR 214. Schultz-Hoff appeared to have left open the possibility that in these circumstances holiday entitlement could accrue indefinitely, assuming that under local law it could not be taken concurrently with sick leave.

In Schultz-Hoff, another German reference, the worker had been off sick from September 2004 until his contract terminated in September 2005. He claimed a payment in lieu of his accrued holiday entitlement for two leave years but was denied his 2004 entitlement by the local courts because the permitted carry-over period was limited to three months. The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll