header-logo header-logo

Immigration and asylum update

10 July 2008 / Doron Blum , Matthew Davies
Issue: 7329 / Categories: Features , EU , Family , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

POINTS BASED SYSTEM

ILLEGAL WORKING

WITHDRAWAL OF MARRIAGE POLICIES

Complication arising from the Home Office’s mission to simplify is keeping practitioners busy across the spectrum of immigration law. New obligations, with heavy penalties for breaching them, now attach to employers and migrants. The withdrawal of established policies and concessions, and confusion as to what replaces them and when, has characterised the “consolidation” of policy guidance. The piecemeal introduction of the points based system (PBS) for economic migration has challenged advisers to discern safe and lawful routes for applicants seeking to preserve, extend, or change immigration status in the UK. Undeterred, the government announces new measures with robust confidence and unprecedented pace.

POINTS BASED SYSTEM—RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
The Statement of Changes in Immigration Rules HC607 was laid before Parliament on 9 June 2008. Key provisions are as follows:

Tier 1
The sub-division of Tier 1 beyond the “General” (post-HSMP) category effectively replaces other existing categories. The Highly Skilled Migrant Programme (HSMP), Business Person, Investor/Innovator and International Graduate Scheme are withdrawn as at 30 June 2008

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll