header-logo header-logo

Increasing judicial diversity

30 January 2020
Issue: 7872 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
Progress on judicial diversity has been slow, according to a JUSTICE working party report published this month

The report, ‘Increasing judicial diversity: an update’, builds on its 2017 report of the same name, which explored the structural barriers faced by women, Black and minority ethnic lawyers, solicitors and those from less advantaged socio-economic backgrounds, in reaching the bench.

Legal rights group JUSTICE notes some headline achievements―two more women Justices at the Supreme Court, four more solicitors appointed to the High Court, and Sir Rabinder Singh’s appointment to the Court of Appeal. More women have been appointed to the Circuit and High Court bench. However, the low numbers overall mean any progress is fragile and there has been negligible improvement in respect of other underrepresented groups, the report says.

The working party concludes that the current approach to judicial diversity ‘is not working’.

It recommends the introduction of ‘targets with teeth’ so there is proper accountability, and the creation of a permanent ‘senior elections committee’ for senior appointments. It urges that a ‘meaningful internal judicial career path’ be set up so judges can begin their career in the more diverse tribunals or as District Judges. Those in leadership positions should commit to a cultural change in the judiciary, where diversity is seen as fundamental to the quality of judging, it says.

Finally, it calls for the selection process to test for judicial potential not previous advocacy experience, and for efforts to be made to tackle affinity bias so that merit is not used as an unconscious proxy for the characteristics of the current cohort of judges.

JUSTICE director Andrea Coomber said: ‘Our senior judiciary continues to be dominated by white men from the independent Bar.’

Issue: 7872 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll