header-logo header-logo

27 January 2012 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7498 / Categories: Features , Damages , TUPE , Employment
printer mail-detail

(In)decision time

Ian Smith pays tribute to some end of term judicial desk clearance

There was a considerable element of judicial desk clearance before the Christmas break, to such an extent that it has been difficult to choose the case law most meriting comment here. Pride of place must go to a Supreme Court decision on contractual liabilities on dismissal, which is of most note for what it did not decide. This case takes up most of this column, but it also contains briefer coverage of another much awaited Supreme Court case, this time on how statutory holidays apply to offshore workers (and possibly to others with unusual working patterns), and an important Court of Appeal decision on a tricky point of TUPE law, arising where there are contemporaneous administration proceedings (often in so-called “pre-pack” cases).

Edwards v Chesterfield

The decision of the Supreme Court in Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Trust; Botham v Ministry of Defence [2011] UKSC 58, [2011] All ER (D) 101 (Dec) stops a potentially major extension of contractual

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll