header-logo header-logo

(In)decision time

27 January 2012 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7498 / Categories: Features , Damages , TUPE , Employment
printer mail-detail

Ian Smith pays tribute to some end of term judicial desk clearance

There was a considerable element of judicial desk clearance before the Christmas break, to such an extent that it has been difficult to choose the case law most meriting comment here. Pride of place must go to a Supreme Court decision on contractual liabilities on dismissal, which is of most note for what it did not decide. This case takes up most of this column, but it also contains briefer coverage of another much awaited Supreme Court case, this time on how statutory holidays apply to offshore workers (and possibly to others with unusual working patterns), and an important Court of Appeal decision on a tricky point of TUPE law, arising where there are contemporaneous administration proceedings (often in so-called “pre-pack” cases).

Edwards v Chesterfield

The decision of the Supreme Court in Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Trust; Botham v Ministry of Defence [2011] UKSC 58, [2011] All ER (D) 101 (Dec) stops a potentially major extension of contractual

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll