header-logo header-logo

Indemnity renewal headache

18 June 2010
Issue: 7422 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Hiked premiums, fewer indemnity insurance providers

Solicitors face a tough indemnity insurance market this year and should look for renewed cover as soon as possible, the Law Society has warned.

The society updated its practice note on professional indemnity insurance (PII) last week to highlight anticipated problems and offer solicitors guidance on how to find the best deal before the 1 October deadline. It warns the market has hardened due to:
l some qualifying insurers exiting the market;
l some insurers narrowing the types of firms offered cover;
l the collapse of the housing market and an increase in mortgage-related fraud leading to concerns among insurers about an imminent increase in conveyancing-related claims; and
l an increase in the amount and value of claims insurers are receiving.
Insurers are scrutinising forms more carefully and being more selective, the practice note warns. Some law firms have had to accept “significantly increased premiums” or have been unable to obtain cover. According to the practice note, “even firms with a clean claims history have experienced difficulties”.

Sole practitioners, firms with fewer than five partners, and firms that perform conveyancing work are among the most affected.
Frank Maher, partner at Legal Risk solicitors, which advises law firms on risk management, says: “It’s highly likely that a significant number of firms won’t get cover or won’t be able to afford it.

“Getting your proposal form in doesn’t mean you’ll get taken on. It’ll be more chaotic this time than last year, particularly at the smaller end of the market.
“Larger firms will find cover, although those that have had claims problems may face a premium hike.”

The society advises that firms should have begun their renewal process by May, and warns that, if claims increase this year, insurers will increase their premiums to recoup their losses. The practice note offers guidance on applying for PII from the assigned risks pool.
 

Issue: 7422 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll