header-logo header-logo

18 June 2010
Issue: 7422 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Indemnity renewal headache

Hiked premiums, fewer indemnity insurance providers

Solicitors face a tough indemnity insurance market this year and should look for renewed cover as soon as possible, the Law Society has warned.

The society updated its practice note on professional indemnity insurance (PII) last week to highlight anticipated problems and offer solicitors guidance on how to find the best deal before the 1 October deadline. It warns the market has hardened due to:
l some qualifying insurers exiting the market;
l some insurers narrowing the types of firms offered cover;
l the collapse of the housing market and an increase in mortgage-related fraud leading to concerns among insurers about an imminent increase in conveyancing-related claims; and
l an increase in the amount and value of claims insurers are receiving.
Insurers are scrutinising forms more carefully and being more selective, the practice note warns. Some law firms have had to accept “significantly increased premiums” or have been unable to obtain cover. According to the practice note, “even firms with a clean claims history have experienced difficulties”.

Sole practitioners, firms with fewer than five partners, and firms that perform conveyancing work are among the most affected.
Frank Maher, partner at Legal Risk solicitors, which advises law firms on risk management, says: “It’s highly likely that a significant number of firms won’t get cover or won’t be able to afford it.

“Getting your proposal form in doesn’t mean you’ll get taken on. It’ll be more chaotic this time than last year, particularly at the smaller end of the market.
“Larger firms will find cover, although those that have had claims problems may face a premium hike.”

The society advises that firms should have begun their renewal process by May, and warns that, if claims increase this year, insurers will increase their premiums to recoup their losses. The practice note offers guidance on applying for PII from the assigned risks pool.
 

Issue: 7422 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll