header-logo header-logo

31 July 2008
Issue: 7332 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection
printer mail-detail

Internet service providers warned over data protection

Legal news

Internet service providers should be aware of the data protection rights of individuals in their fight against illegal online data sharing, say experts.

Last week UK record labels association, the BPI, reached an agreement with Internet service providers (ISPs) and the government on measures to reduce illegal filesharing. The memorandum of understanding (MOU) places commitments on the recording industry and ISPs to develop consumer education programmes and legal online services allowing users to download legal content for free. In addition, “informative letters” are to be sent to users, identified by the BPI, whose accounts are suspected as being used illegally.

Penelope Thornton, associate in intellectual property, media and technology at Lovells, says the parties to the MOU will need to be careful about the operation of the Data Protection Act 1998 in any action taken against filesharers. “In some cases infringement of copyright by peer-to-peer file sharing can amount to a criminal offence, but personal data which relates to alleged criminal activity is ‘sensitive’ personal data under the Act and can normally be processed only with the explicit consent of the individual unless an appropriate exemption applies,” she says.

The MOU announcement was followed swiftly by the launch of a consultation from the Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform. The consultation includes proposals for legislative measures to address illicit filesharing, including granting personal data relating to IP addresses to rights holders on request.

Thornton continues, “In the hands of BPI the IP addresses may well not amount to personal data, but it is likely to be different in the case of the ISPs since they can match the address to a known individual.”

While no specific action was detailed for those that ignore the letters, the introduction of the MOU is seen as a response to government threats to legislate. Earlier this year the government suggested it was planning legislation to make it mandatory for ISPs to take action against those guilty of illegal sharing files. Thornton says the government prefers an industry led approach to the issue and that it has denied it will follow the proposed “graduated response” as in France. It may, however, seek alternative, technology based solutions. “Proposed technical measures to be discussed by ISPs, rights holders and Ofcom, such as filtering and marking content to help identify legitimate content, could be effective solutions. However they have been the subject of bitter negotiations between the ISPs and the rights owners for some time, without any resolution,” she says.

Issue: 7332 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
The High Court has upheld a rare successful serious-irregularity challenge after an arbitrator relied on an implied term neither party had advanced
Thirty years after The Future of Law shook a profession still using fax machines, its central forecast looks increasingly less like prophecy and more like description
More than 100 teams from the legal and financial services sectors competed in five sports at the 51st Law Society RFC Festival of Sport earlier this month
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
back-to-top-scroll