header-logo header-logo

13 March 2020
Categories: Legal News , Tax
printer mail-detail

IR35 attracts lawyers’ ire

Lawyers have slated the decision by the Chancellor to press ahead with IR35 implementation in April
Lawyers have slated the decision by the Chancellor to press ahead with IR35 implementation in April.

The Treasury confirmed in this week’s Budget that it will legislate to implement the changes to the off-payroll working rules (IR35) from 6 April 2020. The rule change aims to catch out contractors who set up limited companies to minimise tax exposure while working in similar conditions to that of an employee.

DWF corporate tax partner Caroline Colliston said the implementation would ‘occur against a backdrop of concerns… about the impact on business, the labour supply chain and the confusion and lack of clarity around the terms and operation of the legislation’.

She suggested employers ‘take quick action’ to ensure compliance, including ‘identifying their contingent workforce, ensuring the burden of operating PAYE is shifted down their contractual labour supply chain, reviewing the terms of contracts in their labour supply chain, adopting robust internal procedures and audits to ensure status determination statements are provided and liability is limited as well as considering establishing an employment status disagreement process’.

Seb Maley, CEO of IR35 compliance specialist Qdos, called the move to continue with the 6 April start date for IR35 a ‘needless, short-sighted tax grab’.

Miles Dean, head of international tax at Andersen Tax UK, said: ‘Contractors are an easy target. The sector has been rife with tax avoidance for many years and this, unfortunately, is the result. Are large corporates, who may have well over 1000 contractors at a time, really supposed to undertake an individual review of each one's affairs and then certify whether or not they’re employees or consultants?

‘Putting the burden of determining status on the third party company is onerous, impractical and unfair to say the least, irrespective of the current coronavirus outbreak. The fact that businesses are at risk from both HMRC and the contractor if it wrongly determines the status of an individual is a very unfortunate feature of the legislation.

‘A form of self-certification from the contractor would be much more equitable, particularly in circumstances where the determination between employee and self-employed is borderline. Which it very often is.’

Categories: Legal News , Tax
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll