header-logo header-logo

19 March 2020
Categories: Legal News , Tax
printer mail-detail

IR35 shelved until 2021

Implementation of the private sector IR35 tax reforms has been postponed for another year

The IR35 rules aim to catch contractors who provide their services through a limited company or other intermediary for tax purposes, and who would otherwise be treated as employees. The government had aimed to extend IR35 to medium and large companies in the private sector, but will now not do so until 6 April 2021.

David Greenhalgh, employment partner at Joelson solicitors, said: ‘From the outset IR35 has been mired in controversy because there is a considerable lack of clarity in both the original legislation and HMRC’s guidelines.

‘Indeed, even HMRC’s own Check Employment Status for Tax (CEST) tool is widely viewed as unfit for purpose and inaccurate, with businesses using the tool reporting they have received indications that IR35 would not apply when it clearly would have. The significant economic and social impact of the COVID-19 crisis has allowed the government to save face by u-turning on a legislative change that was ill-conceived and rushed through.

‘With this delay, businesses and individuals contracting through an intermediary must take time to familiarise themselves with exactly what is expected of them, when IR35 is eventually introduced to the private sector.’

Miles Dean, head of international tax at Andersen Tax UK, said: ‘Thankfully, common sense has prevailed.

‘It’s a shame it took coronavirus for the government to take this action. One hopes that a proper review is undertaken, and consideration given to scrapping the reforms altogether.’

Stephanie Wilson, partner and head of employment tax at BDO, said: ‘The key message is that this is a deferral of the new rules not a cancellation.

‘Once more information has been provided by HM Treasury about the postponement, we will be in a better position to provide a more comprehensive view on the potential impact this change will have on affected organisations businesses. However, it is clear that this further delay to the start date does allow individuals and organisations time to fully prepare themselves for the new rules, including the ability to engage with all relevant parties to effectively implement all necessary change.’

Categories: Legal News , Tax
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll