header-logo header-logo

19 March 2020
Categories: Legal News , Tax
printer mail-detail

IR35 shelved until 2021

Implementation of the private sector IR35 tax reforms has been postponed for another year

The IR35 rules aim to catch contractors who provide their services through a limited company or other intermediary for tax purposes, and who would otherwise be treated as employees. The government had aimed to extend IR35 to medium and large companies in the private sector, but will now not do so until 6 April 2021.

David Greenhalgh, employment partner at Joelson solicitors, said: ‘From the outset IR35 has been mired in controversy because there is a considerable lack of clarity in both the original legislation and HMRC’s guidelines.

‘Indeed, even HMRC’s own Check Employment Status for Tax (CEST) tool is widely viewed as unfit for purpose and inaccurate, with businesses using the tool reporting they have received indications that IR35 would not apply when it clearly would have. The significant economic and social impact of the COVID-19 crisis has allowed the government to save face by u-turning on a legislative change that was ill-conceived and rushed through.

‘With this delay, businesses and individuals contracting through an intermediary must take time to familiarise themselves with exactly what is expected of them, when IR35 is eventually introduced to the private sector.’

Miles Dean, head of international tax at Andersen Tax UK, said: ‘Thankfully, common sense has prevailed.

‘It’s a shame it took coronavirus for the government to take this action. One hopes that a proper review is undertaken, and consideration given to scrapping the reforms altogether.’

Stephanie Wilson, partner and head of employment tax at BDO, said: ‘The key message is that this is a deferral of the new rules not a cancellation.

‘Once more information has been provided by HM Treasury about the postponement, we will be in a better position to provide a more comprehensive view on the potential impact this change will have on affected organisations businesses. However, it is clear that this further delay to the start date does allow individuals and organisations time to fully prepare themselves for the new rules, including the ability to engage with all relevant parties to effectively implement all necessary change.’

Categories: Legal News , Tax
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll