header-logo header-logo

Is social media a defective product? Pt 2

224731
In the second part of this series, Harry Lambert tackles some key questions: is social media a ‘product’ at all, and how might claims be brought against its platforms?
  • Legal debate intensifies over whether platforms qualify as ‘products’ under the Consumer Protection Act 1987—if so, they could face liability for harm caused by their design and algorithms.
  • While the Online Safety Act 2023 imposes duties to tackle illegal and age-inappropriate content, its vague standards and limited scope mean it is both a benchmark and a battleground for future claims.

This series evaluates the potential liability of social media companies for the harms caused by their algorithms and interface designs, conceptualising these platforms as products causing personal injury.

In Pt 1, we considered whether it was possible to sue social media companies at all, or whether they are protected by statutory or contractual immunity (‘Is social media a defective product? Pt 1’, NLJ, 18 & 25 April 2025, pp19-21).

Having

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott strengthens social housing development offering with senior London appointment

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers strengthens Birmingham real estate team with partner hire

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan expands private client and regulatory teams with new legal directors

NEWS
A mood of cautious optimism has enveloped the criminal law sector following indications the Prime Minister may abandon planned jury reforms
Helping to source the services and providers you need
The Senior Courts Costs Office has clarified that judges conducting detailed assessment proceedings cannot order security for costs—a ruling that may leave successful parties exposed to further litigation expense
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
back-to-top-scroll