header-logo header-logo

JAC not to blame for judge shortages

13 September 2007
Issue: 7288 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

News

The head of the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) has hit back at claims that her organisation is to blame for the severe shortage of circuit judges and delays in trials.

Baroness Prashar told The Times that the JAC put forward a shortlist of 102 names to be circuit judges, including 47 recommendations for immediate vacancies in April, but only one had been appointed so far: “So if there is any delay, it is not with us.”

“Our job is to meet the business requirements that we are given and we have done that. It is not our job to call people off the list—that is the job of the department and the judiciary,” she says.

Lord Phillips, the lord chief justice, recently expressed concern about the delays in the appointment of judges, while president of the Family Division of the High Court, Sir Mark Potter, called the vacancies “inexcusable”.
Lady Prashar said the JAC’s new selection process, which was born through the new statutory framework set out in the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, was itself constrained by procedures. “Judges may grumble but equally they will grumble if they are not given time to write their references,” she says.

She adds: “I think it is important that people understand what is actually happening. Carping criticism of a new body does not help. It is not in the public interest because the credibility of the commission matters and ultimately its credibility will depend on the people we appoint.”

Issue: 7288 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll