header-logo header-logo

Jackson: the final chapter

16 August 2017 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7757 / Categories: Opinion , Costs , Jackson
printer mail-detail
nlj_7757_regan

Dominic Regan reports on Lord Justice Jackson’s fixed costs finale

As suggested here 18 months ago, Lord Justice Jackson has come up with a fixed costs model that would broadly apply to cases worth up to £100,000. This is less than half of his opening £250,000 gambit (see ‘Review of Civil Litigation Costs: Supplemental Report—Fixed Recoverable Costs by Lord Justice Jackson’, 31 July 2017).

The superficial attraction of a single set scale of costs has sensibly been jettisoned. Instead, within the proposed new intermediate track there would be four levels of costs, ascending with complexity. Such a nuanced approach is again admirable although I can confidently predict interesting skirmishes over track allocation. ‘Balkanisation’ is more likely to match effort with reward. It is to his credit that Sir Rupert took on board criticism of the ‘one-size-fits-all’ mantra.

Another criticism which he has accepted is that some actions might be worth no more than £100,000 yet could be fiendishly complex. A case estimated

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll