header-logo header-logo

16 August 2017 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7757 / Categories: Opinion , Costs , Jackson
printer mail-detail

Jackson: the final chapter

nlj_7757_regan

Dominic Regan reports on Lord Justice Jackson’s fixed costs finale

As suggested here 18 months ago, Lord Justice Jackson has come up with a fixed costs model that would broadly apply to cases worth up to £100,000. This is less than half of his opening £250,000 gambit (see ‘Review of Civil Litigation Costs: Supplemental Report—Fixed Recoverable Costs by Lord Justice Jackson’, 31 July 2017).

The superficial attraction of a single set scale of costs has sensibly been jettisoned. Instead, within the proposed new intermediate track there would be four levels of costs, ascending with complexity. Such a nuanced approach is again admirable although I can confidently predict interesting skirmishes over track allocation. ‘Balkanisation’ is more likely to match effort with reward. It is to his credit that Sir Rupert took on board criticism of the ‘one-size-fits-all’ mantra.

Another criticism which he has accepted is that some actions might be worth no more than £100,000 yet could be fiendishly complex. A case estimated

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll