header-logo header-logo

Jackson: the final chapter

16 August 2017 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7757 / Categories: Opinion , Costs , Jackson
printer mail-detail
nlj_7757_regan

Dominic Regan reports on Lord Justice Jackson’s fixed costs finale

As suggested here 18 months ago, Lord Justice Jackson has come up with a fixed costs model that would broadly apply to cases worth up to £100,000. This is less than half of his opening £250,000 gambit (see ‘Review of Civil Litigation Costs: Supplemental Report—Fixed Recoverable Costs by Lord Justice Jackson’, 31 July 2017).

The superficial attraction of a single set scale of costs has sensibly been jettisoned. Instead, within the proposed new intermediate track there would be four levels of costs, ascending with complexity. Such a nuanced approach is again admirable although I can confidently predict interesting skirmishes over track allocation. ‘Balkanisation’ is more likely to match effort with reward. It is to his credit that Sir Rupert took on board criticism of the ‘one-size-fits-all’ mantra.

Another criticism which he has accepted is that some actions might be worth no more than £100,000 yet could be fiendishly complex. A case estimated

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll