header-logo header-logo

16 August 2017 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7757 / Categories: Opinion , Costs , Jackson
printer mail-detail

Jackson: the final chapter

nlj_7757_regan

Dominic Regan reports on Lord Justice Jackson’s fixed costs finale

As suggested here 18 months ago, Lord Justice Jackson has come up with a fixed costs model that would broadly apply to cases worth up to £100,000. This is less than half of his opening £250,000 gambit (see ‘Review of Civil Litigation Costs: Supplemental Report—Fixed Recoverable Costs by Lord Justice Jackson’, 31 July 2017).

The superficial attraction of a single set scale of costs has sensibly been jettisoned. Instead, within the proposed new intermediate track there would be four levels of costs, ascending with complexity. Such a nuanced approach is again admirable although I can confidently predict interesting skirmishes over track allocation. ‘Balkanisation’ is more likely to match effort with reward. It is to his credit that Sir Rupert took on board criticism of the ‘one-size-fits-all’ mantra.

Another criticism which he has accepted is that some actions might be worth no more than £100,000 yet could be fiendishly complex. A case estimated

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll