header-logo header-logo

19 March 2014
Issue: 7599 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Jackson: impact on experts

Survey reports reduction in workloads & experience of “bullying”

Expert witnesses have voiced their concerns over the impact of the Jackson reforms, including “bullying” solicitors and reduced fees.

In a survey by legal training company Bond Solon, experts said their fees were falling, with some solicitors trying to “haggle”. They also reported difficulty in setting an overall fee for work from the outset as this in itself often required a lot of research. 

One psychiatrist has experienced a 60% reduction in his workload, with about 30% of quotes now turned down by solicitors, often where the patient bringing the claim had a complex pre-existing medical history. He has noticed an increase in agencies asking him to see clients without prior access to their notes, which he refuses to do.

“In these cases the history needs to be recorded in detail and there are complex issues to discuss in relation to causation,” he says. 

“In most cases the size of the claim is too small to warrant the cost of my report but I am not in the position to cut corners as these are the cases most likely to be challenged. In contrast, clients with no pre-existing psych history can still be seen within acceptable budget. This obviously does raise issues about equitable access to justice/compensation.”

A cardiologist reports: “Solicitors are bullying and even threatening experts that cases will collapse and it is our fault if deadlines aren’t met.” He says he sat up until 3am with a fever to finish a report when he had flu after the instructing solicitor told him he would be held responsible for costs if he was late.

A consultant says: “Cases are poorly defended or argued because of time limits as well as cost limits, medical experts are moving out of my area back into private or NHS work because of draconian time limits and fears of litigation against them if not complied with.”

However, he added that he personally wrote to the judge to ask for more time in his case, after the instructing solicitor refused, and was given an extra six weeks to write his report.

NLJ will publish the second of its exclusive online litigation trends surveys in partnership with the London Solicitors Litigation Association in early April, a year after Jackson.

 

Issue: 7599 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harper James—Lottie Hugo

Harper James—Lottie Hugo

Commercial law firm announces appointment of corporate partner

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
The winners of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026 have now been announced, marking another outstanding celebration of excellence, innovation, and impact across the legal profession
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
back-to-top-scroll