header-logo header-logo

29 January 2016 / Professor Dominic Regan
Issue: 7685 / Categories: Opinion , Budgeting
printer mail-detail

Jackson: this man is not for turning

Sir Rupert’s grand ambitions for future costs reform are breathtaking, as Dominic Regan reports

The audacity of the new Jackson proposals is staggering. Let there be fixed costs across the board in all claims, of whatsoever nature, worth up to £250,000! This was the essence of his speech to the Insolvency Practitioners Association delivered on 28 January.

It will be remembered that in his final report he proposed such an approach for cases worth up to just £25,000 (Review of Civil Litigation Costs: Final Report, January 2010). It never happened. Today, it is in the primary field of modern injury cases that costs are frozen, dependent upon quantum and the stage at which they settle. The time has come for an enormous extension. Why? Budgeting has not received a warm welcome. More than a few judges and practitioners complain that it is an expensive and futile process. The elusive test of proportionality is still wide open.

Nasty problems

Both of these nasty problems will be circumvented

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll