header-logo header-logo

23 October 2019
Issue: 7861 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Judges given guideline on terrorism sentencing

Terrorist supporters face tougher sentences, under proposals put forward by the Sentencing Council in response to legislative change.

In a consultation published this week, ‘Terrorism offences guideline’, the council proposes longer sentences for the ‘encouragement of terrorism’, ‘failure to disclose information about acts of terrorism’ and ‘collection of terrorist information’. The proposals reflect increased statutory maximum sentences introduced by the Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Act 2019.

The council also proposes distinguishing between offenders in a position of authority or influence who directly invite support for a proscribed organisation, and one who is reckless when expressing supportive views.

Sentencing guidelines must be followed, unless the court is satisfied that it would be contrary to the interest of justice to do so. The consultation ends on 3 December 2019, and the changes would come into effect in early 2020.

Sentencing Council member Mr Justice Goose said: ‘Terrorism offences are extremely serious and can cover a wide range of factual circumstances, making them difficult and sensitive offences to sentence. For this reason, the Council is keen to ensure that the guidelines are kept up to date and fit for purpose.’

Issue: 7861 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sharpe Pritchard—Victoria Heald-Barraclough

Sharpe Pritchard—Victoria Heald-Barraclough

Magic Circle hire strengthens Sharpe Pritchard’s infrastructure finance capability

Lewis Silkin—Iskander Fernandez

Lewis Silkin—Iskander Fernandez

Lewis Silkin adds corporate crime specialist to growing dispute resolution team

Morr & Co—Michael Charalambous

Morr & Co—Michael Charalambous

Morr Co strengthens private client team with partner appointment

NEWS
Should every solicitor found to have acted dishonestly face automatic striking off? The answer, argues John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke LLP in NLJ this week, is no 
Winning an arbitral award against a state is one thing; enforcing it is another
Can government success in court tell us whether the rule of law is healthy? 
Poorly drafted dispute resolution clauses can trigger litigation before the real dispute is even addressed
As cryptocurrency becomes mainstream, family lawyers are increasingly confronting the challenges it creates on divorce
back-to-top-scroll