header-logo header-logo

23 October 2019
Issue: 7861 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Judges given guideline on terrorism sentencing

Terrorist supporters face tougher sentences, under proposals put forward by the Sentencing Council in response to legislative change.

In a consultation published this week, ‘Terrorism offences guideline’, the council proposes longer sentences for the ‘encouragement of terrorism’, ‘failure to disclose information about acts of terrorism’ and ‘collection of terrorist information’. The proposals reflect increased statutory maximum sentences introduced by the Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Act 2019.

The council also proposes distinguishing between offenders in a position of authority or influence who directly invite support for a proscribed organisation, and one who is reckless when expressing supportive views.

Sentencing guidelines must be followed, unless the court is satisfied that it would be contrary to the interest of justice to do so. The consultation ends on 3 December 2019, and the changes would come into effect in early 2020.

Sentencing Council member Mr Justice Goose said: ‘Terrorism offences are extremely serious and can cover a wide range of factual circumstances, making them difficult and sensitive offences to sentence. For this reason, the Council is keen to ensure that the guidelines are kept up to date and fit for purpose.’

Issue: 7861 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll