header-logo header-logo

26 September 2025
Issue: 8132 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Discrimination , Sports law , Human rights
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Trans pool player loses discrimination fight

230747
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ

Ms Haynes, a trans woman with a gender recognition certificate (GRC), was barred by the English Blackball Pool Federation from playing for the Kent women’s team after new rules restricted entry to those born female. The court held that under Equality Act 2010 definitions, she could lawfully be treated as male for competition purposes. Her gender reassignment discrimination claim collapsed, with the judge accepting the sport’s physical attributes made it a ‘gender-affected activity’.

Pigott notes that while the decision affirms legal protections for fair competition, it also exposes how little weight GRCs carry under the Equality Act 2010. For trans athletes, the ruling highlights the widening gap between identity recognition and practical inclusion in competitive sport.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll