header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
26 September 2025 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 8132 / Categories: Features , Employment , Discrimination , Human rights , Sports law
printer mail-detail

Gender reassignment discrimination: Claim blackballed?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
230747
Charles Pigott on how the courts are applying the For Women Scotland ruling
  • A county court judge has applied For Women Scotland in a dispute over the membership rules of a sporting association.
  • This is believed to be the first judicial consideration of the ruling at any level in the context of a discrimination claim.

The reserved judgment in Haynes v Thomson on behalf of the English Blackball Pool Federation [2025] EWCC 50 was published on 1 August. It involved a claim for direct gender reassignment discrimination, brought by Ms Haynes. She is a trans woman and is described as an expert player of English eight-ball pool. She has a gender recognition certificate (GRC) under the Gender Recognition Act 2004.

The federation is an unincorporated association which organises pool competitions in England. In August 2023, it announced a change in its rules so that only people born female would be permitted to play in is female competitions and teams. That meant that Ms Haynes could

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Appeal court reins in ‘wrong defendant’ switcheroo

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: Driving test fraudsters steer towards jail
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
NLJ this week: Deepfakes demand data law muscle
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
NLJ this week: 40% penalty for coercive control
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
NLJ this week: Mbappé row spotlights ‘ethics bonuses’
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll