header-logo header-logo

03 July 2009 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7376 / Categories: Features , Tribunals , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

Justice denied?

Chris Bryden & Michael Salter explain why successful tribunal claimants are often short-changed

Ministry of Justice (MoJ) statistics show that only 53% of successful tribunal claimants questioned recently had received the full amount of compensation awarded by the employment tribunal by the end of the 42-day period allowed before interest starts to accumulate. The research, published in May, also found that of the little over 1,000 successful claimants who responded to the questionnaire sent out for the purpose of the paper, 39% had not been paid any compensation, while 40% of unpaid claimants did not know they could enforce the order (see Research into Enforcement of Employment Tribunal Awards in England and Wales).

The results of this survey echo the findings of earlier studies. For example,  in its 2008 Evidence Briefing, Justice Denied, Citizens Advice noted that one in 10 claimants who succeed in their claims is faced with a hollow victory when the employer fails to pay up.

Creatures of statute

It is well known that tribunals cannot enforce their

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
back-to-top-scroll