header-logo header-logo

15 January 2009 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7352 / Categories: Features , Discrimination , Terms&conditions
printer mail-detail

Justifying unequal pay

Was 2008 a significant year for equal pay? asks Charles Pigott

There have been many landmarks in history of the Equal Pay Act 1970 (EPA 1970), but as it reaches late middle age, they seem to be arriving with greater frequency. There were four significant Court of Appeal decisions in 2008, and at least an equal number from the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT). Equal pay cases tend to fall into two broad groups: those that are concerned with essentially preliminary issues, and those that go to the heart of the policy behind the EPA 1970. Recent EAT decisions about the statutory dispute resolution procedures and time limits belong to the former category, and it is unlikely to be long before these issues are addressed by the Court of Appeal.

But last year the Court of Appeal concentrated on cases where the claimants had jumped through all the preliminary hoops. In three cases the Court of Appeal addressed the employment tribunal’s assessment of a pay structure that at first sight indirectly discriminated against women. In

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll