header-logo header-logo

15 January 2009 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7352 / Categories: Features , Discrimination , Terms&conditions
printer mail-detail

Justifying unequal pay

Was 2008 a significant year for equal pay? asks Charles Pigott

There have been many landmarks in history of the Equal Pay Act 1970 (EPA 1970), but as it reaches late middle age, they seem to be arriving with greater frequency. There were four significant Court of Appeal decisions in 2008, and at least an equal number from the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT). Equal pay cases tend to fall into two broad groups: those that are concerned with essentially preliminary issues, and those that go to the heart of the policy behind the EPA 1970. Recent EAT decisions about the statutory dispute resolution procedures and time limits belong to the former category, and it is unlikely to be long before these issues are addressed by the Court of Appeal.

But last year the Court of Appeal concentrated on cases where the claimants had jumped through all the preliminary hoops. In three cases the Court of Appeal addressed the employment tribunal’s assessment of a pay structure that at first sight indirectly discriminated against women. In

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—four appointments

Birketts—four appointments

Firm expands partnership with four lateral hires across key practice areas

Harper James—Lottie Hugo

Harper James—Lottie Hugo

Commercial law firm announces appointment of corporate partner

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joins corporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

NEWS
Serial sperm donor Robert Albon has lost his bid for a declaration of paternity, ‘on the ground that to grant it would manifestly be contrary to public policy’
The government is considering wholesale reform of consumer class actions—the ‘opt-out’ collective claims certified by the Competition Appeals Tribunal (CAT)
A ‘sophisticated suspected fraud’ may have taken place at PM Law involving the improper removal and misuse of about £39.5m of client funds, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has confirmed
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) will invest in technology to catch tech-reliant fraudsters and handle voluminous case materials
Law firms enjoyed rapid growth in 2025, according to a Financial Benchmarking Survey, published by the Law Society last week
back-to-top-scroll