header-logo header-logo

Justifying unequal pay

15 January 2009 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7352 / Categories: Features , Discrimination , Terms&conditions
printer mail-detail

Was 2008 a significant year for equal pay? asks Charles Pigott

There have been many landmarks in history of the Equal Pay Act 1970 (EPA 1970), but as it reaches late middle age, they seem to be arriving with greater frequency. There were four significant Court of Appeal decisions in 2008, and at least an equal number from the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT). Equal pay cases tend to fall into two broad groups: those that are concerned with essentially preliminary issues, and those that go to the heart of the policy behind the EPA 1970. Recent EAT decisions about the statutory dispute resolution procedures and time limits belong to the former category, and it is unlikely to be long before these issues are addressed by the Court of Appeal.

But last year the Court of Appeal concentrated on cases where the claimants had jumped through all the preliminary hoops. In three cases the Court of Appeal addressed the employment tribunal’s assessment of a pay structure that at first sight indirectly discriminated against women. In

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll