header-logo header-logo

Justifying unequal pay

15 January 2009 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7352 / Categories: Features , Discrimination , Terms&conditions
printer mail-detail

Was 2008 a significant year for equal pay? asks Charles Pigott

There have been many landmarks in history of the Equal Pay Act 1970 (EPA 1970), but as it reaches late middle age, they seem to be arriving with greater frequency. There were four significant Court of Appeal decisions in 2008, and at least an equal number from the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT). Equal pay cases tend to fall into two broad groups: those that are concerned with essentially preliminary issues, and those that go to the heart of the policy behind the EPA 1970. Recent EAT decisions about the statutory dispute resolution procedures and time limits belong to the former category, and it is unlikely to be long before these issues are addressed by the Court of Appeal.

But last year the Court of Appeal concentrated on cases where the claimants had jumped through all the preliminary hoops. In three cases the Court of Appeal addressed the employment tribunal’s assessment of a pay structure that at first sight indirectly discriminated against women. In

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Leeds office strengthened with triple partner hire

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Corporate lawyer joins as partner in London office

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll