header-logo header-logo

21 November 2025 / Shabnam Ali-Khan
Issue: 8140 / Categories: Opinion , Leasehold , Property
printer mail-detail

LAFRA 2024: leaseholders in limbo

236044
The government must now consult with professionals on leasehold reform, writes Shabnam Ali-Khan

Renters rights may be grabbing the headlines this month, but leasehold reform is rarely off the news agenda, and rightly so: the system has been criticised for opacity, unfairness and cost. Yet after the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 (LAFRA 2024)—hurried through in the last Parliament—and with a new Leasehold and Commonhold Reform Bill on the horizon, the sector finds itself in limbo.

Leaseholders were promised clarity, simplicity and savings. More than a year later, too little of the Act has been implemented, secondary legislation has been delayed, and crucial test cases are stalled in the courts. Meanwhile, professionals are advising clients through these uncertain times, leaseholders are unsure whether to act now or wait, and the market has been affected. In the unanimous view of professionals, further reform must not be made without genuine consultation and collaboration with those who deal with leasehold every day.

A year of uncertainty

LAFRA 2024 was billed as

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll