header-logo header-logo

04 September 2008 / Rob Jones
Issue: 7335 / Categories: Features , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail

The language of law

Rob Jones ensures all is not lost in translation

In an increasingly integrated global community, with cross-border disputes ever more frequent, the issue of language grows more complex. Documents created in any country and any language can be, and increasingly are, relevant to lawsuits, investigations or regulatory matters. Consequently, legal teams need to be aware of how to equip themselves for the challenge of dealing with multilingual forms of evidence.

A technical minefield

The technical processes in cross-border electronic disclosure are sophisticated, often invoking in-depth analyses of data storage issues. Fundamentally, computers hold data in encoded formats which are alien to most human users. One issue to consider therefore is how such encoding is handled by various types of computer system: does the system decipher or distort the codes which are being used to determine and accurately represent the languages contained in any given document?

There are currently two main methods used in the successful handling of multilingual data—code pages and Unicode. A code page is a cross reference table that translates

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll