header-logo header-logo

08 February 2018
Issue: 7780 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

LASPO failing children

Research reveals thousands of young people ‘at grave risk’

Legal aid cuts in 2013 have had devastating consequences for children, a new report by Coram Children’s Legal Centre (Coram) reveals.

The report, Rights without remedies, which was published this week, shows the impact on children of LASPO (the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012). It highlights how the cuts introduced by LASPO left thousands of children each year at grave risk of miscarriages of justice with some losing their home, legal status, education and family access.

According to the report, at least 6,000 children each year are unable to access legal help or representation on a civil matter. For example, Coram’s Child Law Advice Service (CLAS) believes schools may have acted unlawfully in a quarter of school exclusions by not complying with procedures or not adequately considering special educational needs. However, legal aid was not available in most of these cases.

Coram also estimates that there are several thousand children in local authority care where immigration (rather than trafficking or asylum) is the main issue. Those children would be claimants in their own right but are not eligible for legal aid. While local authorities have a duty to help those children resolve their immigration and legal issues, the relevant statutory guidance is silent on how it is to be funded. Coram estimate it costs local authorities £10m per year, compared to a cost of £6m or less if legal aid were restored.

Consequently, Coram is calling for urgent changes to the government’s exceptional funding ‘safety net’ for vulnerable individuals, and for legal aid to be reinstated for all children in the care of local authorities or where children’s services are involved in private law family proceedings.

Dr Carol Homden, Coram’s chief executive officer, said: ‘Charities cannot, nor can they be expected to, fill the gaps left by limitations to a statutory service.’ 

Issue: 7780 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll