header-logo header-logo

LASPO failing children

08 February 2018
Issue: 7780 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Research reveals thousands of young people ‘at grave risk’

Legal aid cuts in 2013 have had devastating consequences for children, a new report by Coram Children’s Legal Centre (Coram) reveals.

The report, Rights without remedies, which was published this week, shows the impact on children of LASPO (the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012). It highlights how the cuts introduced by LASPO left thousands of children each year at grave risk of miscarriages of justice with some losing their home, legal status, education and family access.

According to the report, at least 6,000 children each year are unable to access legal help or representation on a civil matter. For example, Coram’s Child Law Advice Service (CLAS) believes schools may have acted unlawfully in a quarter of school exclusions by not complying with procedures or not adequately considering special educational needs. However, legal aid was not available in most of these cases.

Coram also estimates that there are several thousand children in local authority care where immigration (rather than trafficking or asylum) is the main issue. Those children would be claimants in their own right but are not eligible for legal aid. While local authorities have a duty to help those children resolve their immigration and legal issues, the relevant statutory guidance is silent on how it is to be funded. Coram estimate it costs local authorities £10m per year, compared to a cost of £6m or less if legal aid were restored.

Consequently, Coram is calling for urgent changes to the government’s exceptional funding ‘safety net’ for vulnerable individuals, and for legal aid to be reinstated for all children in the care of local authorities or where children’s services are involved in private law family proceedings.

Dr Carol Homden, Coram’s chief executive officer, said: ‘Charities cannot, nor can they be expected to, fill the gaps left by limitations to a statutory service.’ 

Issue: 7780 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Richard Meers

Arc Pensions Law—Richard Meers

Pensions litigation team announces senior associate hire

Burges Salmon—Neil Demuth

Burges Salmon—Neil Demuth

Firm appoints new chief financial officer

Anthony Collins—Sue Bearman

Anthony Collins—Sue Bearman

Social purpose firm announces director hire plus eight promotions

NEWS
AlphaBiolabs has made a £500 donation to Sean’s Place, a men’s mental health charity based in Sefton, as part of its ongoing Giving Back initiative
Human rights lawyers, social justice champion, co-founder of the law firm Bindmans, and NLJ columnist Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC has died at the age of 92 years
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll